THE PARABLE OF THE PRODIGAL AND HIS BROTHER: LITERARY AND HISTORY CHRITICISM FROM LUKE 15:11-32

Authors

Keywords:

parable, Literary, History, Criticism, Luke 15:11-32

Abstract

The parable of the prodigal son in Luke 15:11-32 is a passage that is often discussed. The discussion is usually directed to the youngest who realizes his mistake and then returns to his father. The response of the father who hugged the youngest back from his escape drew anger from the eldest. After the story, the reader will close it and take the implications that can be learned from the parable. However, there is another aspect that deserves to be studied, especially regarding the deepest meaning of the parable. This study aims to explain the meaning of the parable of the prodigal son. The research method used is biblical literary and history criticism. The results showed that the meaning of the prodigal son was not only directed to the youngest. But to the eldest who does not understand his father's heart towards those who return from his loss. Thus, what is missing in this parable is the eldest, not the youngest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amos Hosea. (2019). Karakteristik Pendidikan Iman dalam Pentakostalisme. Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi. https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol4i251-57

Arthurs, J. D. (2007). Preaching With Variety: How to Re-create the Dynamics of Biblical Genres (Preaching With Series). Kregel Academic & Professional.

Blomberg, C. L. (2004). Preaching The Parables: From Responsible Interpretation to Powerful Proclamation. Baker Academic.

Boice, J. M. (2001). The Parable of the Sower. Monergism.

Chandra, D. C. (2019). Fungsi Teori dalam Metode Penelitan Kualitatif. Reseach Gate.

Gratia, Y. P. (2020). Ulasan Buku Daniela C. Augustine: Pentecost, Hospitality and Transfiguration-Toward A Spirit-Inspired Vision of Social Transformation. Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 5(1), 11–14.

Hultgen, A. J. (2000). The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary. Eerdmans Publishing.

Jeremias, J. (1972). The Parables of Jesus. Scribne.

Keller, T. (2014). Generous Justice: How God’s Grace Makes Us Just. Penguin Books.

Kistemaker, S. J. (2002). The Parables: Understanding the Stories Jesus Told. Baker Books.

Klein, W. W., Blomberg, C. L., & Hubbard, R. L. (2017). Introduction to Biblical Interpretation: Third Edition. Zondervan Academic.

KR.Pakpahan, G. (2019). TELUSUR KARYA RUAKH(ROH)DALAM PERJANJIAN LAMA. Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 4(2), 1–14.

Leon Morris. (1996). New Testament Theology. Zondervan Publishing.

Marbun, P. (2019). STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN TRANSFORMATIF. Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol4i241-49

Pantan, F. (2016). Metafisika Pendidikan Iman di Gereja. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 1(1).

Sirait, J. E. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Keberhasilan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Bethel Tanjung Priok Jakarta Utara. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 6(1), 46–69.

Sugiono, S., & Hardori, J. (2020). Domain Desain Pembelajaran Inkarnatif. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 5(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol5i214-24

Tenney, M. C. (2001). The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, Vol. 3 (C. F. Pfeiffer & E. F. Harrison (eds.)). Gandum Mas.

Wallace, D. B. (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond and Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of The New Testament. Zondervan Publishing.

Wasino, & Hartatik, E. S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Sejarah: Dari Riset Hingga Penulisan. Magnum, Pustaka Utama.

Wiryohadi, W., Sitompul, P., & Widiada, G. (2021). Model Pendampingan Pastoral Bagi Remaja yang Mengalami Broken Home Guna Membangun Citra dan Konsep Diri yang Benar. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 6(2), 55–71.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

THE PARABLE OF THE PRODIGAL AND HIS BROTHER: LITERARY AND HISTORY CHRITICISM FROM LUKE 15:11-32. (2022). Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 7(1), 1-10. https://sttbi.ac.id/journal/index.php/diegesis/article/view/198