ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN THE CHURCH’S PASTORAL MINISTRY REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF COHABITATION WITHOUT FORMAL MARRIAGE

Authors

  • Brayen Josua Nggariwo STT Gereja Kristen Sulawesi Tengah Tentena

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46933/DGS.vol11i1%25p

Keywords:

cohabitation, deontological ethics, ethical dilemma, marriage theology, pastoral ministry, virtue ethics

Abstract

This study examines the ethical dilemma in church pastoral ministry toward cohabitation without formal marriage, highlighting the gap between the normative affirmation of marriage as a covenant and the need for contextual pastoral accompaniment. Previous studies have tended to assess cohabitation from moral or sociological perspectives but have not articulated an integrative pastoral response model. This qualitative case study involved purposively selected participants (pastors, church elders, and cohabiting couples). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, limited observation, and literature review, and analyzed using thematic coding. An Aristotelian virtue ethics framework was synthetically integrated with Franz Magnis-Suseno’s ethics of responsibility and enriched by a deontological perspective from Immanuel Kant, particularly concerning moral duty and the categorical imperative as a universal norm. This deontological lens sharpens the analysis of moral obligation, public commitment, and respect for human dignity within relational structures. Findings indicate that cohabitation is primarily driven by economic pressures and customary demands rather than theological rejection, and that churches adopt a moderative strategy: liturgical inclusion combined with structural restrictions. The study contributes to the formulation of a gradual pastoral model that upholds doctrinal integrity while fostering relational transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.

Bevans, Stephen B. Models of Contextual Theology. Rev. ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2002.

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. Translated by John W. Doberstein. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.

Dete, M. E., et al. “Praktik Hidup Bersama Tanpa Pernikahan Sah dan Tantangan Pastoral Gereja.” Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual 5, no. 2 (2024): 94–97.

Hart, A. Relational Ethics and Christian Marriage. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018.

Hart, David Bentley. The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.

Hauerwas, Stanley. A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Leavitt, John, Karen Carter, and Michael Wilson. Church, Community, and Cohabitation: New Challenges for Pastoral Care. London: Routledge, 2020.

Liu, Y. “Socio-Economic Determinants of Cohabitation.” Journal of Marriage and Family Studies 17, no. 2 (2022): 140–158.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. Ethics in a Fragmented World: Christianity and Moral Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Magnis-Suseno, Franz. Etika Dasar: Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1987.

Purves, Andrew. Pastoral Theology in the Classical Tradition. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

Smith, R., and D. Jones. Christian Ethics in a Secular Age. London: SCM Press, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN THE CHURCH’S PASTORAL MINISTRY REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF COHABITATION WITHOUT FORMAL MARRIAGE. (2026). Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 11(1), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.46933/DGS.vol11i1%p